• Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Newsletter
Faithfully Magazine
Monday, May 29, 2023
  • About
    • Staff and Advisors
    • Advertise With Us
    • Submissions
  • Q&As
    John Blake photo by John Nowak for CNN

    CNN Reporter Talks Race, Faith and Reconciliation in Powerful Memoir ‘More Than I Imagined’

    Brown Baby Jesus author Dorena Williamson

    Author Celebrates Jesus’ Messy, Multiethnic Family Tree in ‘Brown Baby Jesus’

    KevOnStage and MrsKevOnStage in an interview with Faithfully Magazine.

    Interview: KevOnStage and MrsKevOnStage Talk Sex, Therapy, and Why ‘Marriage Be Hard’ (Video)

    Christina Edmondson and Ekemini Uwan on Truth's Table book

    ‘Truth’s Table’ Authors Talk Early Beginnings, Centering Black Women, and Inspiring One Another

  • Exclusives
    Karen Abercrombie

    After Award-Winning Role in Top-Grossing Christian Movie, Karen Abercrombie Is Leading Change From Within

    black women group

    ‘Righteous and Ratchet’ Black Women of Faith Embraced on Jemele Hill’s ‘Sanctified’ Podcast

    Josh McDowell

    Apologist Josh McDowell Backtracks After Claiming Black Families Don’t Value Education

    Christian author and preacher Dr. Voddie Baucham

    ‘Fault Lines’ Author Voddie Baucham Confused or Making Things Up, Richard Delgado Says in Response to Misquote on ‘Righteous Actions’ of Whites

  • Profiled
    Chris Broussard

    Sports Analyst Chris Broussard Uses Hoops and Christianity to Address Needs of Young Men

    Bishop Noel Jones

    Bishop Noel Jones: Engagement, Life, Family and Ministry (Profiled)

    nadine raphael

    From Prison to the Pulpit: Nadine Raphael on God’s ‘Greater Plan’ for Her Life (Profiled)

    lisa sharon harper

    Lisa Sharon Harper Is Her ‘Ancestors’ Wildest Dreams’ (Profiled)

  • Remember
    Rev. Dr. William Hiram Bentley

    Black Evangelicalism and the Reforming Influence of William H. Bentley

    Marie Bassili Assaad and Mother Irene

    Knitting Together the Community of Love: Lessons From Marie Bassili Assaad and Mother Irene

    Rev. Sutton E. Griggs

    The Complex Legacy of Sutton E. Griggs: From Respected Leader to Race Traitor?

    fannie lou hamer

    Fannie Lou Hamer: Forerunner of Faith-Driven, Pro-Life Democrats (Remember)

  • Opinion & Analysis
    migrants

    When Faith Says to Help Migrants — and the Law Says Don’t

    couple with child

    Missionary System That Brought US Man Accused of Abusing African ‘Orphans’ Was Always Deeply Flawed

    Civil Rights March 1963

    The Women Who Stood With Martin Luther King Jr. and Sustained a Movement for Social Change

    pile of books

    In New Jersey, School Segregation Didn’t End; It Evolved

  • Specials
    • All
    • Growing a Green Church
    laudato trees earthbeat

    Laudato Trees Planting Program Enlists Catholic Properties to Help Increase DC’s Canopy

SUBSCRIBE
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
Faithfully Magazine
No Result
View All Result

Carol Anderson Sees a Threat to Black Americans in the Second Amendment’s Origins

FM Editors by FM Editors
June 8, 2021
Reading Time: 7 mins read
Carol Anderson, a professor at Emory University, was driven to write The Second after Philando Castile was killed by the police in 2016

Carol Anderson, a professor at Emory University, was driven to write "The Second" after Philando Castile was killed by the police in 2016. (Photo: Stephen Nowland/Emory University)

136
SHARES
ShareTweetPin It

By Errin Haines, The 19th

During an interview with Carol Anderson around the 2018 midterm elections and voting rights, she mentioned that she was already working on her next book, and the topic grabbed my attention: the relationship between Black Americans and the Second Amendment.

In my career, I have spent a lot of time thinking about the intersection of race and society. And like Professor Anderson, the killing of Black Americans at the hands of law enforcement — including lawful gun owners like Philando Castile — had me asking many of the same questions she raises inThe Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America.

Below is our conversation about the roots of this inequity and Anderson’s thoughts on where the issue stands today, particularly in the wake of events like the January 6 insurrection.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

RELATED POSTS

CNN Reporter Talks Race, Faith and Reconciliation in Powerful Memoir ‘More Than I Imagined’

Baby Mila Jackson’s Parents Chose Midwife’s Care Over Hospital; Now She’s in Foster Care

Historian Connects Shirley Chisholm’s Life and Politics in New Biography

Errin Haines: What inspired you to write a book about African Americans and the Second Amendment?

Carol Anderson: I got the idea for this book after the murder of Philando Castile, seeing how he followed NRA guidelines when pulled over by the cops, and he got shot dead. And the NRA goes virtually silent. They’re basically silent when a Black man is shot for no other reason than owning a licensed gun? That’s what got me on this hunt.

The Castile shooting happened right after the Fourth of July holiday, when America celebrates our country’s freedoms and founding principles like the Second Amendment. And yet, the shootings of unarmed Black Americans feel like a reminder that those freedoms still don’t fully extend to them. 

My work is really attracted to understanding the fractured citizenship of Black people in the United States. And this was an area that I had not covered previously. And Philando Castile’s murder, the NRA’s virtual silence and the questions asked by journalists really helped me go and explore what is called a basic foundational citizenship right. And to find that the Second Amendment is about how to deny Black people their rights.

There are many amendments to the Constitution where you see inequality existing. But you assert that the inequality that exists as it pertains to the Second Amendment is actually dangerous for Black people. Talk to me about why it matters more that the Second Amendment does not apply equally for Black Americans.

Whereas the other amendments are predicated on the access to rights — you have the right not to be illegally searched and seized; you have the right to a speedy and fair trial; you have the right to a jury trial in a civil suit; you have the right to freedom of religion; you have the right to freedom of association — what we get in the Second Amendment is not this expansion of rights, but we get an amendment that is about a militia that is designed to curtail Black people’s rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

So sitting in the Bill of Rights is the right to curtail Black people’s rights. That’s what makes it so pernicious. To me, part of what has happened is that we have crafted a historical narrative that has made the Second Amendment hallowed ground, and that has treated the militia as defenders of democracy.

The messaging around the Second Amendment has not only been about Black subjugation, but it is also perpetuating the myth of the White hero in this country and the idea of who gets to be a patriot, who gets to be a citizen. And core to that criteria is one’s ability and right to bear arms, right?

After the Civil War … that only White folks were willing to take up arms and fight for this nation. And it ignores that you had Black folks willingly demanding to be able to fight. The narrative becomes that only Whites fought for this nation. It makes Whites the hero in the building and the founding and of the fighting for this nation. In the first Congress, one of the first bills that they draft says White men — it doesn’t say all able-bodied men — must join the militia, and they must own a gun. So, making it foundational to citizenship, to being part of this militia.

So then the effect is that the Second Amendment reinforces the idea that citizenship and Americanness is the purview of White men in this country.

Yes. And part of what I’m also really going after here is that it is anti-blackness, it is the fear of Black people, the crafting of blackness as a threat, as danger, as a source to be feared. And so with this book, I’m tracking not only the origins of the Second Amendment, but then how the ways that we even understand it, how they apply and don’t apply to Black folk: The right to self defense, the right to a well regulated militia, and the right to bear arms. What does that look like over time?

What I found is that regardless of the legal status of Black folk — enslaved, free black, denizen, newly emancipated freed people, Jim Crow Black, or post civil rights Black — it’s the same kind of fractured citizenship, where blackness is the threat. It doesn’t matter whether Black folks are armed, they’re a threat. If they’re unarmed, they’re vulnerable, and they’re still a threat.

I want to stick with this self-defense piece. You talk about “stand your ground” laws in the book and say these laws are like “quicksand” for Black folks. Can you elaborate on what you mean, on how you see a racial element to why that is unacceptable for some people.

The “stand your ground” law deals with perceived threat, if you perceive that you are threatened, if you’re someplace where you have a right to be. When you think about Black as the default threat, then that perception of threat … The message that that sends to Black Americans is that you don’t you don’t have the right to stand your ground. If you are threatened by Whites, stand your ground is not an option really available to you. You have no standing.

Circling back to the militia aspect of this, I’m wondering about your thoughts on present-day militias like the insurrectionists that stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6?

I think about how you had those armed White men sitting in the Michigan legislature, and how they stormed that Capitol, demanding to see the governor. The response was not to put pressure on them, not to kick them out, not to shoot them. The response was, ‘They’ve got a point of view that they need to get across.’

And that’s what I mean by the way that we have elevated the Second Amendment to hallowed ground, and therefore elevated the militia to this sanctified space without really recognizing that, at the time, the role of the militia was to control Black people, was to stop Black people from having the right to freedom.

What I see is a nation so steeped in anti-blackness … When I talk about the conundrum of the Second, it is that when Black folk are armed, they’re a threat. And you get massive state firepower being waged against them. When Black folks are unarmed, there’s still a threat. They’re just vulnerable to the violence that will rain down on them. It is anti-blackness in American society that is the issue.

Blackness is the weapon. It’s not the gun. How many unarmed Black folks have you seen gunned down?

I want to talk about the right to bear arms. I wonder what you make of the idea that you are increasingly seeing lawful gun ownership among African Americans as part of them claiming their citizenship, and specifically them claiming their right to bear arms under the Second Amendment as Americans?

Why as a country, are we not talking more about the Second Amendment as part of the larger conversation around Black Lives Matter?

That is a great question. I think that the issue of gun rights and gun ownership gets tied into that narrative of pathology of “Black on Black crime.” What we don’t say is that yes, over 80% of African Americans are killed by African Americans, but over 80% of Whites are killed by Whites. But we don’t talk about “White on White crime.” The narrative of “Black on Black crime” is what short-circuits a full engagement with the role of the Second Amendment in Black Lives Matter?

If Black Lives Matter, do Black people have a right to defend themselves? Do Black people have a right to bear arms in this country? And do Black people have a right not to be killed? And to not have their blackness seen as a weapon? 

It is this box that Black folks are in: What is the acceptable way to be Black? What is the acceptable way to protest? And how are you allowed to demonstrate your citizenship?

It’s that kind of disparity that is why I also ended the book with the Kyle Rittenhouse story. I juxtapose that to Tamir Rice, where you’ve got this 12-year-old child playing alone in a park with a toy gun and is immediately identified as a threat by police and they shoot him within two seconds and he died. Kyle Rittenhouse is a 17-year-old who has an illegal weapon, crosses state lines with this illegal weapon, and the police welcome him during a protest. And Rittenhouse then guns down three people, killing two of them and severely injuring a third. As he walks towards the cops with his hands up, strapped with his rifle, the cops don’t even pay him any attention. They don’t see threat, right?

Can I ask about the Second Amendment as it applies to the intersection of race and gender? Is it even more perilous when we’re talking about the Second Amendment and Black women?

I think about Breonna Taylor. Black women are threats. Their blackness makes them a threat. And then they’re not provided any of the protection that being a woman provides. We’ve got to protect ourselves.

Editor’s note: This article was republished from The 19th under a Creative Commons license.


Share This Post

Share via

Share This Post

  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • Flipboard
  • SMS
More
  • Report
136
SHARES
ShareTweetPin It
Tags: BooksCarol AndersonSecond AmendmentThe 19th
FM Editors

FM Editors

Faithfully Magazine is a fresh, bold and exciting news and culture publication that covers issues, conversations and events impacting Christian communities of color.

Related Posts

John Blake photo by John Nowak for CNN
Features

CNN Reporter Talks Race, Faith and Reconciliation in Powerful Memoir ‘More Than I Imagined’

May 2, 2023
baby mila jackson parents
Features

Baby Mila Jackson’s Parents Chose Midwife’s Care Over Hospital; Now She’s in Foster Care

April 19, 2023

Recommended Stories

North Korea

Baptist Pastor: Kim Jong-Un Is ‘Evil’ So Bible Says Trump Can ‘Take Him Out’

August 9, 2017
empty restaurant

More White Christians Say Businesses Should Refuse Serving Black Americans Based on Religious Grounds

June 30, 2019
Rod Parsley is pastor of World Harvest Church in Columbus, Ohio.

Rod Parsley Blames Churches for Helping to Produce ‘Homegrown Terror’ of Racial Hatred

August 31, 2017

Popular Stories

  • stream movies laptop

    Free Christian Movies: How and Where to Watch Free Christian Movies Online

    459 shares
    Share 183 Tweet 115
  • Are Jesus and John the Baptist Cousins or Related in Anyway?

    417 shares
    Share 166 Tweet 104
  • Paige Hilken, Wife of North Coast Church Pastor Christopher Hilken, Dies by Suicide

    406 shares
    Share 162 Tweet 102
  • After 20 Years, Bishop Noel Jones Says He’s Finally Ready to Marry Partner Loretta Jones

    362 shares
    Share 145 Tweet 91
  • NYC Megachurch Pastor A.R. Bernard’s Son Dies After Losing Battle With Alcoholism

    285 shares
    Share 114 Tweet 71

Copyright © 2023 Faithfully Media, LLC. This website participates in affiliate programs.

No Result
View All Result
  • About
    • Staff and Advisors
    • Advertise With Us
    • Submissions
  • Q&As
  • Exclusives
  • Profiled
  • Remember
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Specials

Copyright © 2023 Faithfully Media, LLC. This website participates in affiliate programs.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Share via

Share This Post

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Copy Link
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Flipboard
  • SMS

Add New Playlist

Add to Collection

  • Public collection title

  • Private collection title

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Send this to a friend